The SQL syntax below is correct for DB2 (and most other SQL databases) to retrieve values from two related tables using a join.
Here is an analysis.
SELECT NAME, D.DEPTNO, DEPTNAME
FROM EMP E, DEPT D
WHERE E.DEPTNO = D.DEPTNO
Explanation:
-
Tables Involved:
- EMP (aliased as E) - presumably an Employee table containing employee details like NAME and DEPTNO (department number).
- DEPT (aliased as D) - a Department table containing department details like DEPTNO and DEPTNAME.
-
Join Type:
- This is an implicit inner join written in the older SQL style (pre-ANSI-92), where the join condition is specified in the WHERE clause rather than using the JOIN keyword. In DB2, this syntax is still valid and widely supported.
-
Columns Selected:
- NAME (from the EMP table, no alias needed since it’s unambiguous).
- D.DEPTNO (department number from the DEPT table, qualified with the alias D to avoid ambiguity since DEPTNO exists in both tables).
- DEPTNAME (from the DEPT table).
-
Join Condition:
- WHERE E.DEPTNO = D.DEPTNO ensures that rows from EMP and DEPT are matched based on the common DEPTNO column, linking employees to their respective departments.
Equivalent Explicit Join (Modern Syntax):
In modern SQL (ANSI-92 style), which is also fully supported in DB2, this could be rewritten as:
SELECT E.NAME, D.DEPTNO, D.DEPTNAME
FROM EMP E
INNER JOIN DEPT D
ON E.DEPTNO = D.DEPTNO
Both versions will work in DB2 and produce the same result: a list of employee names along with their department numbers and department names, where the rows are matched based on the DEPTNO column.
Notes on DB2 Compatibility:
- The syntax you provided is valid in DB2 (e.g., IBM DB2 for z/OS, LUW, etc.).
- DB2 supports both the older comma-separated table style with WHERE conditions and the newer explicit JOIN syntax.
- Ensure the tables (EMP and DEPT) and columns (NAME, DEPTNO, DEPTNAME) exist in your specific DB2 database schema.